CONCESSIONS
Just as many people claim that the best way to win a fight is not to have one, sometimes the most effective means of making an argument is by limiting its scope. A concession gives ground to those who disagree with the writer in some fashion, thereby reducing the ability of readers to disagree with the writer.
Overview:
Concessions serve both ‘logical’ and ‘rhetorical’ functions. On one hand, conceding ground limits what the writer has to prove. For example, the claim “Americans are healthier than ever before” might be tough to prove. However, the claim “Many Americans are healthier than they were 10 years ago” is a little easier. The writer only needs to research a decade instead of a couple of centuries, and the word ‘many’ keeps the writer from having to prove that all Americans are healthier.
Additionally, agreeing with a reader is a way to help establish a bond or common ground. For example, in an argument about obesity, the writer might concede “recently, many people have begun to make an effort to cut back on junk food.” This allows the reader to nod and agree before the next sentence “However, not enough people are making this change” advances the actual argument. The writer concedes that some people are doing better, just not everybody.
Application:
College-level arguments require concessions. Students must constantly limit the scope of their arguments, for a number of reasons. Sometimes, the student just doesn’t have the ability to argue some facts (e.g. a student might concede that fatty acids can counteract some of the harms of obesity, simply because the student does not understand how this might or might not work). At other times, the student might make a concession to avoid a headache (e.g. that same obesity paper might concede that low-fat foods are getting more popular, just because it’s not worth the time it would take to find out actual growth rates in low-fat-food sales). Yet another form of concession comes for the sake of narrowing an argument down to a manageable size (e.g. the paper concedes that exercise is just as important as diet, but then focuses on diet as ‘an important half of the equation’).
Students have to be willing to make concessions in order to present more balanced, more persuasive, and more contained arguments
What to Avoid:
Avoid making unqualified statements and imbalanced arguments. Words like all, every, never, and best are typically out of place in academic writing. Words like most, seldom, and superior will often work better. Additionally, students should avoid making arguments that give readers no choice but to agree with a radical position or to reject it—frequently, the readers will reject it. As an aside, students should probably avoid sources that make unqualified arguments, themselves.
Just as many people claim that the best way to win a fight is not to have one, sometimes the most effective means of making an argument is by limiting its scope. A concession gives ground to those who disagree with the writer in some fashion, thereby reducing the ability of readers to disagree with the writer.
Overview:
Concessions serve both ‘logical’ and ‘rhetorical’ functions. On one hand, conceding ground limits what the writer has to prove. For example, the claim “Americans are healthier than ever before” might be tough to prove. However, the claim “Many Americans are healthier than they were 10 years ago” is a little easier. The writer only needs to research a decade instead of a couple of centuries, and the word ‘many’ keeps the writer from having to prove that all Americans are healthier.
Additionally, agreeing with a reader is a way to help establish a bond or common ground. For example, in an argument about obesity, the writer might concede “recently, many people have begun to make an effort to cut back on junk food.” This allows the reader to nod and agree before the next sentence “However, not enough people are making this change” advances the actual argument. The writer concedes that some people are doing better, just not everybody.
Application:
College-level arguments require concessions. Students must constantly limit the scope of their arguments, for a number of reasons. Sometimes, the student just doesn’t have the ability to argue some facts (e.g. a student might concede that fatty acids can counteract some of the harms of obesity, simply because the student does not understand how this might or might not work). At other times, the student might make a concession to avoid a headache (e.g. that same obesity paper might concede that low-fat foods are getting more popular, just because it’s not worth the time it would take to find out actual growth rates in low-fat-food sales). Yet another form of concession comes for the sake of narrowing an argument down to a manageable size (e.g. the paper concedes that exercise is just as important as diet, but then focuses on diet as ‘an important half of the equation’).
Students have to be willing to make concessions in order to present more balanced, more persuasive, and more contained arguments
What to Avoid:
Avoid making unqualified statements and imbalanced arguments. Words like all, every, never, and best are typically out of place in academic writing. Words like most, seldom, and superior will often work better. Additionally, students should avoid making arguments that give readers no choice but to agree with a radical position or to reject it—frequently, the readers will reject it. As an aside, students should probably avoid sources that make unqualified arguments, themselves.
